Login
Home > Blog > Regulatory Economics

19 May 2010

Carbon Taxes:
Reduce global warming or raise revenue?

by Richard Belzer

in

Previously we have blogged on so-called Pigouvian taxes as policy remedies for addressing climate change, noting how they often degenerate into schemes for raising revenue rather than equalizing private and social cost. Today's news brings another example.

More...

2 May 2010

Can States Regulate Immigration? Part 11
How Opposition to Arizona SB 1070 May Be Harming Unlawful Aliens

by Richard Belzer

in , ,

We have reviewed Arizona's new immigration law (SB 1070) and posted an analysis of its major provisions. The Arizona House subsequently passed a revision, and we analyzed that. Meanwhile, opponents have reacted stridently, calling the state of Arizona:

Some of those offering equivocal or negative commentary about the law admit they have not read it (e.g., Marco Rubio, Tom Ridge).

As our previous posts here and here make clear, these characterization are not based on the text of the law, which makes it a state crime to violate federal immigration law. Ironically, the use of extreme language by opponents of the law may have the unintended effect of better achieving the law's objectives than the law itself.
More...

30 Apr 2010

Can States Regulate Immigration? Part 10
Arizona legislature may amend SB 1070

by Richard Belzer

in , ,

Alia Beard Rau of the Arizona Republic reports that Arizona legislators are proposing to make technical changes to SB 1070, the law enacted on April 23 that makes certain federal immigration law violations state crimes.

More...

27 Apr 2010

Can States Regulate Immigration? Part 9
Arizona Senate Bill 1070

by Richard Belzer

in , ,

Arizona's legislature last week enacted legislation that has garnered considerable press attention and commentary, including criticism by President Obama (New York Times, Fox News, NPR, Real Clear Politics. In a Sunday op-ed published by the Washington Post, Phoenix mayor Phil Gordon says the bill is the product of a "far-right legislature"; that it is unconstitutional; and that it is motivated by "the vocal, spiteful few" who are "bitter, small-minded and full of hate." Gordon and others vow to challenge the law's constitutionality "because of the civil rights being violated and the vagueness of the statute." Colorado Democratic Rep. Jared Polis compares the law with Nazi Germany prior to the Holocaust and says he fears "Arizona is headed for a police state."

Gordon's views seem typical of those views expressed in commentaries published since Gov. Jan Brewer signed the bill into law on April 23. We've seen very few editorials and commentaries supporting the law (e.g., IBD, ).

News stories seem to track this editorial pattern; the AP, for example, uses opponents as its source for fact claims about the law, not its actual text. Meanwhile, published commentary appears to be unrepresentative of public opinion. Pollster Scott Rasmussen reports 70% of Arizona voters favor the law and 23% oppose it.

Today we analyze the text of the bill.

More...

23 Mar 2010

Black Market Economics:
Humboldt County, California

by Richard Belzer

in

Mexico is getting a lot of attention for how the illegal drug business has distorted its politics, economy and society. A Dallas Morning News story reports that there have been 4,500 murders in Ciudad Juarez since January 2008.

Black markets affect parts of the United States, too, and not just major urban areas. There is the case of bucolic Humboldt County California, a verdant rain forest hard up on the State's northwest coast.

More...

22 Feb 2010

Health Care Legislation, Part 14:
Obama's January 22 proposal

by Richard Belzer

in , ,

President Obama announced a televised meeting for Thursday to discuss all options for health care legislation. Overnight, the White House released "The Obama Plan: Stability & Security For All Americans," which the President intends to be the focal point for the event. Although this Plan is short, the White House also released a one-page summary.

The January 22 Obama Plan is not accompanied by legislative text. Thus, it can only be analyzed in qualitative terms. We do that below the jump.

More...

17 Feb 2010

Counting Jobs Created or Saved by the "Stimulus" Bill, Part 5:
On the first anniversary

by Richard Belzer

in

Yesterday the White House released the Administration's first annual report on the "stimulus bill" (the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, or "ARRA"). The Administration and its critics are sparring over how many jobs the bill "created or saved."

Where do the numbers come from?

More...

1 Feb 2010

Counting Jobs Created or Saved by the "Stimulus" Bill, Part 4:
Jobs 'created or saved' becomes jobs 'funded'

by Richard Belzer

in

Washington Post staff writer Ed O'Keefe says the "Obama administration's economic stimulus program created nearly 600,000 jobs in the final three months of 2009."

These figures are analogous to those reported three months ago and which caused significant controversy. Initial reporting was rife with errors and relied on a system that impeded error correction.

They are different, however, in ways that make them incomparable with the figures initially reported.

More...

23 Jan 2010

Counting Jobs Created or Saved by the "Stimulus" Bill, Part 3:
Estimation replaced by assumption

by Richard Belzer

in

Previously, we have noted that the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board, which is responsible for ensuring accountability and transparency in the reporting of jobs "created or saved" by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA, or "stimulus" bill), was not actually performing this task. Further, the underlying data were invalid and unreliable because the Office of Management and Budget did not specify a consistent estimation methodology.

Recently, Washington Post staff writer Alec MacGillis reported that White House Council of Economic Advisers chairman Christina Romer now claims ARRA "has created or saved between 1.7 million and 2 million jobs."

Examining these figures closely reveals that they are not estimates at all, but assumptions built into the Administration's estimation model.

More...

13 Jan 2010

Sin Taxes:
Maryland's proposed 10-cent per drink alcohol tax

by Richard Belzer

in

Sin taxes are always popular with legislators. People volunteer to pay them, and volunteers garner little public sympathy.

Maryland legislators are proposing to levy a new tax of ten cents per eight ounces of alcoholic beverage sold in the State. A news story today shows how proponents of sin taxes tend to also be in favor of sin.

More...

7 Jan 2010

A Pollution Tax or a New Sales Tax?
The District of Columbia charges 5 cents for each disposable shopping bag

by Richard Belzer

in

On January 1, the District of Columbia began imposing a a 5-cent "fee" on disposable shopping bags.

Is this a pollution tax, as its backers claim, or just another sales tax?

More...

4 Jan 2010

The Market Failure in Mail-Order Brides:
Can State regulation help?

by Richard Belzer

in ,

Washington Examiner reporter Alan Suderman says "Maryland lawmakers are pushing for tighter regulations on the mail-order bride industry."

There is no question Maryland can write more regulations. But can regulation solve market failure?

More...

28 Dec 2009

Health Care Legislation, Part 11:
Insight from the funny papers

by Richard Belzer

in , ,

Both the Senate and House versions of health care legislation include provisions that would prohibit insurers from declining to underwrite people with preexisting conditions and prevent them from imposing annual or lifetime caps on coverage.

Today's Shoe illustrates one of the problems with these proposed restrictions.

More...

22 Dec 2009

Health Care Legislation, Part 10:
The bill that passed cloture

by Richard Belzer

in , ,

We've delayed publishing analysis of the Senate's health care bill until a version could garner 60 votes, and thus survive a cloture vote to cut off debate. That bill is Majority Leader Reid's manager's amendment to HR 3590.

More...

30 Nov 2009

Health Care Legislation, Part 9:
Why supporters insist on the individual mandate

by Richard Belzer

in , ,

In its debate over health care legislation, the Senate and the Obama administration must contend with conflicting forces and incentives. There appears to be a political consensus among supporters that "guaranteed issue" and "community rating" are essential features of any bill. ("Guaranteed issue" means people cannot be denied coverage no matter how risky they are. "Community rating" means people with low health risks have to subsidize them.)

As we have noted several times now, keeping these features requires that everyone have health insurance. This means people with low health risks must be compelled to buy (and pay too much for) health insurance.

More...

 1  2  3  4  5  6     »